Primary Analysis

ALECENSA® (alectinib) Significantly Improved PFS vs Crizotinib

ALECENSA reduced the risk of progression or death by nearly half2

PFS at Primary Analysis2 | IRC

ALECENSA® (alectinib) vs Crizotinib PFS: 47% reduction in risk of progression or death
  • Median duration of follow-up: 18.6 months (range: 0.5-29.0 months) for ALECENSA and 17.6 months (range: 0.3-27.0 months) for crizotinib3
  • ORR: ALECENSA 79% (95% CIb: 72, 85); crizotinib 72% (95% CIb: 64, 79); P=0.16522,a
    • CR/PR: ALECENSA 13%/66%; crizotinib 6%/66%
  • DOR: Response duration ≥6 months: ALECENSA 82%; crizotinib 57%2
  • OS: At the time of data cutoff, OS data were not mature2

PFS at Primary Analysis | INVESTIGATOR

  • In the ITT population, mPFS was not estimable at the time of data cutoff in patients receiving ALECENSA (95% CI: 17.7, NE) compared with 11.1 months in patients receiving crizotinib (95% CI: 9.1, 13.1); HR=0.48 [95% CI: 0.35, 0.66]; P<0.00012,3

aStratified by race (Asian vs non-Asian) and CNS metastases at baseline (yes vs no) for Cox model, log-rank test, and Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test, respectively.
bClopper and Pearson exact binomial 95% CI.

Follow-Up Analysis Tag 10 Months Later

ALECENSA Reached a mPFS of 34.8 months

PFS at Follow-Up Analysis (Exploratory)4,15  | INVESTIGATOR

ALECENSA® (alectinib) vs Crizotinib PFS at Follow-Up Analysis: mPFS of 34.8 months
  • Median duration of follow-up: 27.8 months (range: 0.5-38.7 months) for ALECENSA and 22.8 months (range: 0.3-36.7 months) for crizotinib4,15
    • There was no additional IRC assessment performed at this time15

The follow-up analysis was performed when approximately 50% of patients in the ALECENSA arm experienced a PFS event and was conducted for the purpose of obtaining a median estimate of PFS. No formal treatment comparisons were performed for the follow-up analysis.4

ALECENSA Delivered a Consistent PFS Benefit Across Multiple Prespecified Subgroups

Primary Analysis

Prespecified Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of PFS3 | INVESTIGATOR

ALECENSA® (alectinib) vs Crizotinib HR for Disease Progression or Death in Subgroups

Adapted from The New England Journal of Medicine, Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al, Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer, Vol 377, 829-838. Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

All exploratory analyses are descriptive in nature. Subgroups were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Hazard ratios were estimated from unstratified analyses.16

PFS in Patients With and Without CNS Metastases 

Primary Analysis

Prespecified Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of PFS4,17 | INVESTIGATOR

Primary Analysis of PFS ALECENSA® (alectinib) vs Crizotinib With and Without CNS Mets Subgroups
Follow-Up Analysis Tag 10 Months Later

Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of PFS15 | INVESTIGATOR

Follow-Up Analysis of PFS ALECENSA® (alectinib) vs Crizotinib With and Without CNS Mets Subgroups

All exploratory analyses are descriptive in nature. Subgroups were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Hazard ratios were estimated from unstratified analyses.16

1L=first-line; CI=confidence interval; CNS=central nervous system; CR=complete response; DOR=duration of response; ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR=hazard ratio; IRC=Independent Review Committee; ITT=intention to treat; mPFS=median progression-free survival; NE=not estimable; ORR=objective response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; PR=partial response. 

Alectinib (ALECENSA) NCCN Recommendation Category 1 Preferred

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) recommend alectinib (ALECENSA) as a first-line treatment option for ALK+ metastatic NSCLC (Category 1, Preferred). 5*†

*When an ALK rearrangement is discovered prior to first-line systemic therapy.
NCCN makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding their content, use, or application, and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.

1L Primary & Exploratory 5-Year OS Data icon

1L Primary & Exploratory
5-year OS Data

View exploratory landmark analysis.

Dosing and Administration icon

Dosing and Administration

Learn about dosing and monitoring for ALECENSA.

Resources icon

Financial Support for Patients

Learn more about ALECENSA patient financial and practice resources.

Indication

ALECENSA is indicated for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Warnings and Precautions

Hepatotoxicity

  • Of 405 patients, elevations of AST >5X the upper limit of normal (ULN) occurred in 4.6% of patients, and elevations of ALT >5X the ULN occurred in 5.3% of patients. Elevations of bilirubin >3X the ULN occurred in 3.7% of patients. The majority (69% of the patients with hepatic transaminase elevations and 68% of the patients with bilirubin elevations) of these events occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. Six patients discontinued ALECENSA for Grades 3-4 AST and/or ALT elevations, and 4 patients discontinued ALECENSA for Grade 3 bilirubin elevations. Concurrent elevations in ALT or AST ≥3X the ULN and total bilirubin ≥2X the ULN, with normal alkaline phosphatase, occurred in <1% of patients treated with ALECENSA across clinical trials. Three patients with Grades 3-4 AST/ALT elevations had drug-induced liver injury (2 documented by liver biopsy)
  • Monitor liver function tests including ALT, AST, and total bilirubin every 2 weeks during the first 3 months of treatment, then once a month and as clinically indicated, with more frequent testing in patients who develop transaminase and bilirubin elevations. Based on the severity of the adverse drug reaction, withhold ALECENSA and resume at a reduced dose, or permanently discontinue ALECENSA

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis

  • ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 3 (0.7%) patients treated with ALECENSA. One (0.2%) of these events was severe (Grade 3)
  • Promptly investigate for ILD/pneumonitis in any patient who presents with worsening of respiratory symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis (eg, dyspnea, cough, and fever)
  • Immediately withhold ALECENSA treatment in patients diagnosed with ILD/pneumonitis and permanently discontinue ALECENSA if no other potential causes of ILD/pneumonitis have been identified

Renal Impairment

  • Renal impairment occurred in 8% of patients. The incidence of Grade ≥3 renal impairment was 1.7%, of which 0.5% were fatal events
  • Dose modifications for renal impairment were required in 3.2% of patients. Median time to Grade ≥3 renal impairment was 3.7 months (range 0.5 to 14.7 months)
  • Permanently discontinue ALECENSA for Grade 4 renal toxicity. Withhold ALECENSA for Grade 3 renal toxicity until recovery to ≤1.5X ULN, then resume at reduced dose

Bradycardia

  • Symptomatic bradycardia can occur with ALECENSA. Cases of bradycardia (8.6%) have been reported in patients treated with ALECENSA. Eighteen percent of 365 patients treated with ALECENSA for whom serial ECGs were available had heart rates of <50 beats per minute (bpm)
  • Monitor heart rate and blood pressure regularly. Dose modification is not required in cases of asymptomatic bradycardia. In cases of symptomatic bradycardia that are not life-threatening, withhold ALECENSA until recovery to asymptomatic bradycardia or to a heart rate of ≥60 bpm and evaluate concomitant medications known to cause bradycardia, as well as anti-hypertensive medications. If attributable to a concomitant medication, resume ALECENSA at a reduced dose upon recovery to asymptomatic bradycardia or to a heart rate of ≥60 bpm, with frequent monitoring as clinically indicated. Permanently discontinue ALECENSA in case of recurrence. Permanently discontinue ALECENSA in cases of life-threatening bradycardia if no contributing concomitant medication is identified

Severe Myalgia and Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Elevation

  • Myalgia or musculoskeletal pain occurred in 26% of patients. The incidence of Grade 3 myalgia/musculoskeletal pain was 0.7%. Dose modifications for myalgia/musculoskeletal pain were required in 0.5% of patients
  • Elevations of CPK occurred in 41% of 347 patients with CPK laboratory data. The incidence of Grade 3 elevations of CPK was 4.0%. Median time to Grade 3 CPK elevation was 14 days (interquartile range 13-28 days). Dose modifications for elevation of CPK occurred in 3.2% of patients
  • Advise patients to report any unexplained muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. Assess CPK levels every 2 weeks for the first month of treatment and as clinically indicated in patients reporting symptoms. Based on the severity of the CPK elevation, withhold ALECENSA, then resume or reduce dose

Hemolytic Anemia

  • Hemolytic anemia has been reported with ALECENSA, including cases associated with a negative direct antiglobulin test (DAT) result. If hemolytic anemia is suspected, withhold ALECENSA and initiate appropriate laboratory testing. If hemolytic anemia is confirmed, consider resuming at a reduced dose upon resolution or permanently discontinue

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

  • Based on findings from animal studies and its mechanism of action, ALECENSA can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. Administration of ALECENSA to pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis resulted in embryo-fetal toxicity and abortion at maternally toxic doses with exposures approximately 2.7X those observed in humans with ALECENSA 600 mg twice daily. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus
  • Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with ALECENSA and for 1 week following the final dose

Most Common Adverse Reactions

  • The most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were constipation (34%), fatigue (26%), edema (22%), myalgia (23%), and anemia (20%)

Use in Specific Populations

Pregnancy

  • Based on animal studies and its mechanism of action, ALECENSA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are no available data on ALECENSA use in pregnant women
  • In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively

Lactation

  • Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants from ALECENSA, advise a lactating woman not to breastfeed during treatment with ALECENSA and for 1 week after final dose

Females and Males of Reproductive Potential

  • ALECENSA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with ALECENSA and for 1 week after the final dose
  • Based on genotoxicity findings, advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with ALECENSA and for 3 months following the final dose

Hepatic Impairment

  • Increased exposure of alectinib occurred in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C). The recommended dose of ALECENSA in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) is 450 mg orally twice daily

Patient Counseling Information

Photosensitivity

  • Inform patients of the signs and symptoms of photosensitivity. Advise patients to avoid prolonged sun exposure while taking ALECENSA and for at least 7 days after discontinuation and to use proper protection from the sun. Advise patients to use a broad spectrum ultraviolet A (UVA)/ultraviolet B (UVB) sunscreen and lip balm (SPF ≥50) to help protect against potential sunburn

You may report side effects to the FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. You may also report side effects to Genentech at 1-888-835-2555.

Please see additional Important Safety Information in full Prescribing Information.

    • IQVIA US Claims, July 2020-March 2022.

      IQVIA US Claims, July 2020-March 2022.

    • ALECENSA [prescribing information]. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech USA, Inc; 2021.

      ALECENSA [prescribing information]. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech USA, Inc; 2021.

    • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:829-838.

      Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:829-838.

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc.

    • Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V.3.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed May 12, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org.

      Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V.3.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed May 12, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org.

    • Carnio S, Novello S, Mele T, Levra MG, Scagliotti GV. Extending survival of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 2014;41:69-92.

      Carnio S, Novello S, Mele T, Levra MG, Scagliotti GV. Extending survival of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 2014;41:69-92.

    • Deeken JF, Löscher W. The blood-brain barrier and cancer: transporters, treatment, and Trojan horses. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1663-1674.

      Deeken JF, Löscher W. The blood-brain barrier and cancer: transporters, treatment, and Trojan horses. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1663-1674.

    • Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, et al. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl):178S-201S.

      Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, et al. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl):178S-201S.

    • Jena A, Taneja S, Talwar V, Sharma JB. Magnetic resonance (MR) patterns of brain metastasis in lung cancer patients: correlation of imaging findings with symptom. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:140-144.

      Jena A, Taneja S, Talwar V, Sharma JB. Magnetic resonance (MR) patterns of brain metastasis in lung cancer patients: correlation of imaging findings with symptom. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:140-144.

    • Sakamoto H, Tsukaguchi T, Hiroshima S, et al. CH5424802, a selective ALK inhibitor capable of blocking the resistant gatekeeper mutant. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:679-690.

      Sakamoto H, Tsukaguchi T, Hiroshima S, et al. CH5424802, a selective ALK inhibitor capable of blocking the resistant gatekeeper mutant. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:679-690.

    • Kodama T, Hasegawa M, Takanashi K, Sakurai Y, Kondoh O, Sakamoto H. Antitumor activity of the selective ALK inhibitor alectinib in models of intracranial metastases. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:1023-1028.

      Kodama T, Hasegawa M, Takanashi K, Sakurai Y, Kondoh O, Sakamoto H. Antitumor activity of the selective ALK inhibitor alectinib in models of intracranial metastases. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:1023-1028.

    • Löscher W, Potschka H. Blood-brain barrier active efflux transporters: ATP-binding cassette gene family. NeuroRx. 2005;2:86-98.

      Löscher W, Potschka H. Blood-brain barrier active efflux transporters: ATP-binding cassette gene family. NeuroRx. 2005;2:86-98.

    • Schinkel AH, Jonker JW. Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:3-29.

      Schinkel AH, Jonker JW. Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:3-29.

    • Bartels AL. Blood-brain barrier p-glycoprotein function in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:2771-2777.

      Bartels AL. Blood-brain barrier p-glycoprotein function in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:2771-2777.

    • Camidge DR, Dziadziuszko R, Peters S, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data and impact of the EML4-ALK fusion variant on the efficacy of alectinib in untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the global phase III ALEX study [published online March 19, 2019]. J Thorac Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.007.

      Camidge DR, Dziadziuszko R, Peters S, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data and impact of the EML4-ALK fusion variant on the efficacy of alectinib in untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the global phase III ALEX study [published online March 19, 2019]. J Thorac Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.007.

    • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(protocol):1-384.

      Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(protocol):1-384.

    • Gadgeel, S. Alectinib vs crizotinib in treatment-naïve ALK+ NSCLC: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study. Oral presentation at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September, 2017; Madrid, Spain.

      Gadgeel, S. Alectinib vs crizotinib in treatment-naïve ALK+ NSCLC: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study. Oral presentation at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September, 2017; Madrid, Spain.

    • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(suppl):1-14.

      Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(suppl):1-14.

    • Camidge DR, Peters S, Mok T, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from the global phase III ALEX study of alectinib (ALC) vs crizotinib (CZ) in untreated advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Abstract no. 9043. Presented at: 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2018; Chicago, IL.

      Camidge DR, Peters S, Mok T, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from the global phase III ALEX study of alectinib (ALC) vs crizotinib (CZ) in untreated advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Abstract no. 9043. Presented at: 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2018; Chicago, IL.

    • Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, et al. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(8):1056-1064.

      Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, et al. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(8):1056-1064.